VEQT vs VGRO: All-Equity or Growth?

Same Provider, Different Risk Profiles

VEQT and VGRO are both from Vanguard Canada. They use the same underlying equity ETFs, have the same MER (~0.20%), and follow the same fund-of-funds approach. The only difference is what you're choosing: how much risk you want to take.

VEQT: 100% equity. All stocks, no bonds.

VGRO: 80% equity, 20% bonds. Mostly stocks, with a cushion.

That 20% bond allocation is the entire debate.

What Do the Bonds Actually Do?

VGRO's 20% bond allocation comes from two Vanguard bond ETFs that hold a mix of Canadian government bonds, corporate bonds, and global bonds.

Bonds tend to behave differently from stocks. In simple terms:

• When stocks crash, bonds typically hold steady or even go up. This means VGRO drops less than VEQT during a downturn.
• When stocks surge, bonds grow more slowly. This means VGRO gains less than VEQT during a bull market.

The bonds are there to reduce the overall volatility of your portfolio. They're a shock absorber.

The Numbers in a Bad Year

Let's make this concrete. In a severe market downturn where global stocks fall 35%:

• VEQT might drop approximately 35%
• VGRO might drop approximately 28% (because the bond portion provides a buffer)

On a $100,000 portfolio, that's the difference between watching your account go from $100,000 to $65,000 versus $100,000 to $72,000. Both hurt, but $7,000 of cushion might be the difference between staying the course and panic-selling.

When VEQT Makes More Sense

You might prefer VEQT if:

• You have a long time horizon — 10, 20, or 30+ years until you need the money. Over very long periods, 100% equity has historically produced higher returns than balanced portfolios.
• You genuinely won't panic in a crash — and not just theoretically. If you've lived through a 30-40% drop and stayed invested, you know you can handle it. If you haven't, be honest with yourself about how you'd react.
• You're in the accumulation phase — you're regularly contributing new money, which means downturns are actually buying opportunities for you.
• You want to maximize long-term growth — and you understand that the cost of higher returns is a bumpier ride.

When VGRO Makes More Sense

You might prefer VGRO if:

• You have a medium time horizon — 5 to 15 years. The shorter your timeline, the more a bad sequence of returns can hurt you, and the more bonds help cushion that risk.
• You know yourself — you say you can handle a crash, but you've never actually experienced one with real money. VGRO gives you a smoother ride to build that confidence.
• You're approaching or in early retirement — some bond exposure starts to make more sense as you get closer to needing the money.
• You value sleep over maximum returns — there's genuine value in a portfolio that doesn't keep you up at night.

The Psychological Angle

Here's something that doesn't show up in backtests: the best fund is the one you can actually hold through a crash.

A purely rational investor would always choose VEQT over VGRO for a 20+ year horizon. But humans aren't purely rational. When markets crash 35%, news headlines are terrifying, and your portfolio is deep in the red, the urge to sell is overwhelming.

If VEQT's volatility would cause you to sell during a downturn, then VGRO — with its lower expected returns but smoother ride — might produce better real-world returns for you. The math doesn't matter if you can't stick to the plan.

That said, if you're reading a site called BuyVEQT, you probably already have the conviction to hold through volatility. VEQT rewards that conviction over time.

The best investment plan is the one you can actually follow. A "suboptimal" plan that you stick with beats an "optimal" plan that you abandon.

Historical Context

Over rolling 20-year periods, 100% equity portfolios have historically outperformed 80/20 portfolios the vast majority of the time. In fact, over every 20+ year period in modern market history, 100% equity has come out ahead. The equity premium — the extra return you earn for accepting stock market volatility — is real and well-documented.

The 20% bond allocation in VGRO provides a psychological cushion, but at a real cost to long-term compounding. That bond drag reduces expected returns by roughly 0.5-1% per year on average. Over 25 years, that difference compounds into tens of thousands of dollars on a typical portfolio. For an investor with a 10+ year horizon who can stay the course, VEQT is the mathematically stronger choice.

You Can Always Switch (Sort Of)

A common approach for younger investors:

1. Start with VEQT while you have decades ahead and are regularly contributing
2. Eventually shift toward VGRO (or VBAL — Vanguard's 60/40 fund) as you approach retirement

This is perfectly reasonable. Just be mindful that selling VEQT to buy VGRO in a non-registered account triggers a capital gains event. In a TFSA or RRSP, you can switch freely with no tax consequences.

See the Live Comparison

For up-to-date performance data and a side-by-side comparison of VEQT and VGRO, check out our VEQT vs VGRO comparison page.

The Bottom Line

Both VEQT and VGRO are excellent, low-cost, diversified products from Vanguard. If you're within 5-10 years of needing the money or you genuinely can't handle 30%+ drawdowns, VGRO's smoother ride is worth the cost.

But if your time horizon is 10 years or more and you have the discipline to stay invested through downturns, VEQT gives you the highest expected return for a single-ticket Canadian ETF. That's why we're here.